One of the things I enjoy most about directing the Institute
for the Study of Sexual Identity (www.sexualidentityinstitute.org) at Regent
University is the
opportunity to conduct original research on the topic of sexual identity in
ways that are particularly relevant to the Christian community. I tend to look
at how topics are studied in the mainstream gay, lesbian, and bisexual research
and consider the questions that might be asked on behalf of the Christian
community. Because of the ways in which the broader culture and specific
organizations have engaged the topic of homosexuality and sexual identity (and
fostered a kind of “culture war” approach), it has been helpful to conduct
research that speaks to some of the complexities in this area. One of those
questions has to do with the experiences of sexual minorities on Christian
university and college campuses. (I am using the phrase “sexual minority” to
simply recognize that most people do not experience same-sex attraction or have
a homosexual orientation; they are in the numeric minority. I am not making a
political statement or suggesting anything associated with the civil rights
movement.)
When I look at the mainstream portrayal of these students, I
see only one way of thinking about them. For example, Equality Ride
(http://www.soulforce.org/programs/equality-ride/), an activist group, portrays
these students is as if they are all essentially closeted and in need of
freedom from oppressive campus policies. I am not saying that there are no
students who think that way or who have had negative experiences. I have met
several over the time I have consulted at various institutions affiliated with
the Council of Christian Colleges and Universities (CCCU). However, I have
reason to believe that they are not the only sexual minorities on Christian
colleges campuses. I doubt that they currently reflect the views of most
sexual minorities on Christian college campuses.
A few years ago colleagues and I published the first study
we were aware of that specifically focused on Christians who experience
same-sex attractions and attend one of three CCCU institutions (Yarhouse,
Stratton, Dean, & Brooke, 2009). We asked about various milestone events in
sexual identity development, and we were impressed by the fact that few
reported several of the more common milestone events that lead to a gay or
lesbian identity. For example, only a small percentage reported engaging in
same-sex behavior, initially attributing their attractions to a gay identity,
or integrating their attractions into a gay identity. In answers to other
questions we asked, the sexual minorities in the study also reflected quite
conservative beliefs and values. In a follow-up study that is currently under
review, we see similar results in which a fairly conservative sample is not
following the mainstream gay and lesbian developmental models for embracing a
gay identity.
What do I make of this? First, from a developmental
perspective, I think we are witnessing a different developmental trajectory
among Christian sexual minorities, most of whom do not (at least at the time of
the survey) integrate their same-sex sexuality into a gay or lesbian identity.
The values they appear to see in a gay or lesbian identity do not appear to
reflect the values they themselves hold. Second, and as a result of the first
point, most of these sexual minorities appear to be selecting Christian
colleges because the conservative Christian sexual ethics reflected in the
position statements of these institutions reflect the personal beliefs and
values of most of these students. They attend these institutions because they
share the values of those institutions.
That may change over time, of course, but that appears to be what we see
in the current data.
What we also see is that sexual minorities do not find the
climate at Christian colleges very helpful for those who experience same-sex
attraction. This may seem obvious, but it has to addressed. If we keep in mind
that most Christians who experience same-sex attraction are sincerely
struggling to sort out their sexual identity questions, we have to create a
better climate for them to do that. What we see today is that the climate is
not a supportive atmosphere to navigate this particular terrain. Climate can be
set by many factors, and we only asked about a few things in our initial
survey, so this is an area that should be studied further. But what we found
was that the climate was set primarily by other students (rather than faculty
or staff). Students appear to set climate through teasing and related
comments—using derogatory terms for various sexual minorities that keep their
peers in check. This is more so the case among men, but it also happens among
women. These seem to be the last “acceptable” ways to denigrate one’s peers in
a Christian setting.
This can change, and it needs to change. There is a need for
students to take the lead in setting a different climate on Christian college
campuses (with support from faculty, staff, and administration). There is a
need for this to happen not because of external pressure to conform to a vision
of mainstream gay and lesbian identity development or because an activist
organization portrays students in ways that reflects their own values. Rather,
the motivation can come from the awareness that such derogatory phrases are
wrong in terms of Christian morality—it is not how we ought to relate to one
another. Further, such language can end up driving fellow believers who
struggle in this area away from our own communities—which are meant to be an
extension of the Body of Christ—and into the gay community. There are certainly
many people in the gay community who see Christian sexual minorities as having
more in common with the gay community than the conservative Christian
community. The Christian community could take the opposite position: that
Christians who struggle with sexual identity have more in common with the
Christian community than the gay community. But we rarely here anyone talk that
way. Indeed, there appear to be many more people in the gay community than
there are in the Christian community ready to provide support and answers to
fundamental questions that are ultimately tied to identity (“Who am I?”) and
community (“Of which community am I a part?”).
I recognize that there are no easy answers here. One of the
challenges that arise when students, for example, try to make these changes is
that other students may label them “pro gay” for taking any sort of supportive
position, and then we are back to a “culture war” mentality. Christians would
do well to step outside of that framework and into a truly Christian
understanding in which we hold and act upon convictions about respect for the
dignity and worth of all people while also articulating and adhering to
orthodoxy in sexual ethics. These expressions of respect and clarity about
sexual ethics all flow naturally from Christianity, but many of us have a
difficult time in consistently maintaining and expressing them. My experience
is that the more politicized these issues become, the more polarized we become,
and neither politics nor polarization have seemed to bring many helpful
resources to the sexual minorities who are asking for help navigating their
sexual identity in light of their Christian identity. We can do better.
References
Yarhouse, M. A. (2010). Homosexuality and the Christian: A guide for pastors, parents, and friends. Minneapolis, MN: BethanyHouse.
Yarhouse, M. A. (2010). Homosexuality and the Christian: A guide for pastors, parents, and friends. Minneapolis, MN: BethanyHouse.
Yarhouse, M. A., Stratton, S. P., Dean,
J. B., & Brooke, H. L. (2009). Listening to sexual minorities on Christian
college campuses. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 37 (2), 96-113.
Mark A Yarhouse, Psy.D.
Professor of Psychology & Endowed Chair
Professor of Psychology & Endowed Chair
Director, Institute for the Study of Sexual Identity
www.sexualidentityinstitute.org
School of Psychology and Counseling
Regent University
School of Psychology and Counseling
Regent University
No comments:
Post a Comment